<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passion towards an IDE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gurovich.com/site/2007/05/30/passion-towards-an-ide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gurovich.com/site/2007/05/30/passion-towards-an-ide/</link>
	<description>Strategic eCommerce Technology and Architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Proctor</title>
		<link>http://gurovich.com/site/2007/05/30/passion-towards-an-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danilogurovich.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/passion-towards-an-ide/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I hope you are enjoying your R&amp;D into JBoss Rules, MR3 will be out any day now and has significant improvements to the declarativeness of the grammar and our eclipse based ruleflow modelling, along with pluggeable dialects and MVEL integration.

We don&#039;t have an intellij plugin or any plans to do one in the future - this is simply due to resources. Tooling takes a huge effort and we simply don&#039;t have the resources to do both IDEs. No one from the community has been forth coming in porting our eclipse stuff to intellij or netbeans; which is a shame as I would love to see someone in the community build strong intellij/netbeans support for JBoss Rules. So until then you&#039;ll need to use Eclipse to get the most out of JBoss Rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are enjoying your R&amp;D into JBoss Rules, MR3 will be out any day now and has significant improvements to the declarativeness of the grammar and our eclipse based ruleflow modelling, along with pluggeable dialects and MVEL integration.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have an intellij plugin or any plans to do one in the future &#8211; this is simply due to resources. Tooling takes a huge effort and we simply don&#8217;t have the resources to do both IDEs. No one from the community has been forth coming in porting our eclipse stuff to intellij or netbeans; which is a shame as I would love to see someone in the community build strong intellij/netbeans support for JBoss Rules. So until then you&#8217;ll need to use Eclipse to get the most out of JBoss Rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
